Heidekolb's Blog

Whatever happened to Psychotherapy? – A Jungian Rant | January 25, 2010

What did happen to psychotherapy? The word alone can send unpleasant shivers down the spine of some and evoke images of state regulated symptom control in order to increase “evidenced based” productivity in the workforce and compliance with societal norms. It sounds sickening, but is true. We have created a narrow path of what is considered “good mental health” and in the process marginalized large numbers of people who do not fit the established criteria. Is psychotherapy supposed to be that?  It is certainly not what I had in mind when I entered the field. And I would like to believe that the founders of modern psychotherapy from Freud to Jung, would be, maybe not surprised, but still abhorred by what psychotherapy has become nowadays, particular in institutional settings.

Psyche means soul and psychology is the science of the soul, while our word therapy derives from the Greek therapeia, which means healing. The Greek myth of Psyche talks about her suffering, not because she is “ill” but her suffering being an unavoidable  “symptom” of her journey towards union with her love Eros and ultimately on her journey towards immortality. By learning to love and by enduring the pain associated with it we transcend our physical limitations.

Looked at from this perspective we are all in need of healing and guidance. It removes the prevalent and stigmatizing divide between the “healthy” and the “ill”.  Our current definition of “mental health” causes more harm than help. It terrorizes the soul. The truth is we are all in the same boat. We may have different life stories and we may be at different stages of psychic development, but we all participate in the same divine drama of becoming conscious of who we are, which may be just another way of stating our movement towards immortality.

Therapists of the Jungian persuasion appreciate the soul. We are stewards for psyche. We cannot serve two masters. We cannot serve the collective and psyche at the same time. When Jung developed his idea of “individuation”, he understood that an individual following his true calling may be taken far from collective values and expectations. To walk one’s own path may at times take one even far from what is considered “good mental health”. If you have not ventured into the darkest recesses of your soul, no treasure shall ever be yours.

But we therapists must not fall into the deadly trap of believing that we facilitate a healing or that we have the capacity to guide  a patient’s psyche. That would be a fatal inflation. What we can, in fact, what we must do is twofold. For one, we must provide a safe space, a container for the work to occur and we must develop eyes to see the energetic shifts and battles fought out in this space. We can hope, maybe even pray that the true guide of souls, Hermes, shows up  and guides the work.

This necessary safe space is not unlike the alchemical vessel. It is both an actual physical location, as well as an imaginal space. It is the field created between therapist and patient. We can imagine this field as a crucible, an open vessel. This kind of soul work is not counceling. We do not give advice. On the imaginal level it is a relationship between two equals. The sparks and darts (transference) will fly back and forth. It will get heated. The imaginal vessel needs an opening for toxic vapors (emotions) to be released.  A therapist will begin to “see” the circulating energy as old contents are broken down, bottomless despair is mutually suffered and only then, with grace, a new content in the form of an unexpected thought, an image, a dream will present itself.

At other times the vessel of soul work needs to be imagined as hermetically sealed. When new life needs to be protected. This could be when the therapist senses, “sees” the shimmer of a newly emerging attitude in the patient. Often before the patient has any awareness of it or is unwilling to imbue it with any energy. Just like a plant needs water and light, a barely present new psychic attitude needs to be watered with feeling and fed with the energy of intent.

All too often have the inner workings of the therapy vessel been forgotten. What has survived are the outer manifestations of confidentiality and the code of ethics to protect the patient. Both are crucial aspects of therapeutic work, but without an eye for  the drama lived out in the imaginal space of therapeutic work, soul is abandoned one more time again. So you psychotherapists out there, in whose service are you?


  1. This is fascinating! What an interesting perspective , thanks!

    Comment by Splinteredones — January 25, 2010 @ 7:26 am

  2. Once again a Jungian illuminating an aspect of the Eros/Psyche myth. Made me go back to James Hillman, Donald Kalshed, and the recent work of Ken Kimmel on “The Burn Wound of Eros.” Kathleen Raine (A “Jungian” in her own way) with her focus on Blake’s incorporation of the myth into his own mythology is equally fascinating on this subject. Mythology seems to lead us towards concepts of “breakthrough” as opposed to those of “breakdown.” Most needed. Do continue your blog. Quite stimulating.

    Comment by Craig — January 27, 2010 @ 10:27 am

  3. […] Very cool post! RT @heidiko44 Whatever happened to Psychotherapy? – A Jungian Rant [SEO: A favorite quote from this article: "If you have not ventured into the darkest recesses of […]

    Pingback by Best Tweets for Trauma Survivors (week ending 01/29/10) « Third of a Lifetime — January 29, 2010 @ 8:39 pm

  4. Thank you for your blog. Your discussion of psychology and its lack or loss of soul is the very discussion I’ve been having with myself most recently. I am not a psychologist but I have been reading quite deeply Jung and all things of mythology and depth psychology. If I had another life to live this is where I’d plant myself. Your piece on alchemy, too, is filled with rich insight. You clearly articulate that connection between the alchemist’s outer finaglings with matter and the deeper knitting together of inner and outer world. This is a rich blog and I shall return often. It inspires me to begin my own. Thank you for taking us “into the deep.” I have written a number of articles on some of these matters for Suite101.com. Your feedback would be invaluable. I will post the link.

    Comment by Megge — April 18, 2010 @ 7:59 am

  5. I don’t practise as a therapist.

    To answer your question: Psychotherapy became professionalised. And so real contact and real relationships between people become more and more difficult. Anxieties about insurance and the bureaucratic avoidance of same adds another layer of problems.

    The solution? Different ways of practising and different ‘institutions’.

    Comment by Evan — September 29, 2010 @ 11:06 pm

  6. I have been wandering around with that question for the last two years. I have spent years training and growing into this sacred work only to see it neutralized by the psychiatric and pharmaceutical establishment. Mainstream psychiatrists are wedded to an industry whose only interest is the number of prescriptions that can be filled with their patented medications.

    I am beyond sad that psyche’s voice is rarely audible in this “evidenced based” environment.

    Comment by Aviva Ariel — October 7, 2010 @ 4:33 pm

  7. Well said! The notion that what the collective needs and what individual psyches need to individuate are different is a source of great confusion, especially because not only insurance companies, but society elders often deny that such a rift even exists. To just acknowledge could make a big difference by giving suffering meaning.

    Comment by Don Silver — June 16, 2012 @ 4:42 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: